From our Walnut Creek law firm, our leading attorneys serve injury victims throughout Oakland, Livermore, Fairfield, and Antioch, California. Reach out today and schedule a free consultation with us to discuss your injury claim.
You should feel confident in your legal partner. Our attorneys offer over 60 years of combined legal experience and are ready to advocate for you
A trustworthy attorney can make all the difference. You can count on us to pursue the maximum financial compensation you need for recovery.
You deserve to understand what your options are. With our knowledge & Spanish-speaking capabilities, we can make complex legal terms accessible.
Workers' Compensation & Personal Injury Attorneys in Walnut Creek, California
Practice Areas
Partner With Attorneys You Can Trust
Brand Peters PC is unique because of our ability to handle both personal injury and workers’ compensation cases. From construction accidents to traffic collisions, our attorneys have ample experience in mediating and litigating wide a range of case types.
Accident insurance should give you peace of mind when misfortune strikes. But sometimes, insurance companies will attempt to avoid their responsibilities to cut costs. If you or a loved one has been injured at work or because of a different act of negligence, don’t hesitate to call our Bay Area law firm. We proudly serve those throughout Oakland, Livermore, Fairfield, and Antioch, California.
Case Results
Don’t Settle For Less
We Fight to Right the Wrongs
After being injured in an on-the-job accident, you should not hesitate to obtain the help of a workers’ compensation attorney from Brand Peters PC. With extensive experience in all matters related to work injury claims and filing for workers’ compensation, you can trust us to represent you. We also assist clients who are struggling with a range of matters related to workers’ compensation, including eligibility requirements, obtaining medical treatment, and obtaining temporary disability benefits. No matter how complex your situation may be, our workers’ comp attorneys are here to help you move forward.
We have the resources and skills to handle claims that involve multiple parties and lengthy settlement processes. If you or someone you love has been hurt in an accident, one of our personal injury attorneys will fight for the fair compensation you need to navigate the recovery process and rebuild your life after the misfortune. We have successfully represented thousands of injured clients throughout the San Francisco Bay area and are ready to provide you with the care and support you deserve. Call us at (925) 489-0746 today in Walnut Creek, California, to schedule your free initial consultation.
Contact Us Today!
Testimonials
Our Blogs
Premises Liability & Negligent Security in Walnut Creek: What Property Owners and Visitors Should Know
California property owners and businesses have a legal duty to keep their premises reasonably safe, and in some cases that duty extends to protecting visitors from foreseeable crime committed by someone else. When a shopping center, apartment complex, parking structure, or bar in Walnut Creek fails to provide reasonable security and a visitor is assaulted, robbed, or otherwise harmed, the property owner may share responsibility for what happened. Understanding how California courts define foreseeability, whose duty applies, and what deadlines govern these claims can help clarify what options may be available after an incident.
The Legal Basis for Premises Liability in California
California Civil Code Section 1714 sets out the general rule that every person is responsible for injuries caused by a lack of ordinary care in the management of their property. Building on that statute, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Rowland v. Christian identified a set of factors courts use to decide whether a property owner owed a duty of care in a specific situation, including:
- The foreseeability of harm
- The closeness of the connection between the property condition and the injury
- The burden that a given safety measure would place on the owner
Premises liability covers a wide range of incidents, from slip and falls to swimming pool accidents. Negligent security is a more specific category within that broader area of law: it addresses situations where a criminal act by a third party, rather than a physical hazard like a wet floor, causes the injury.
Negligent Security as Its Own Category of Claim
Negligent security claims ask a different question than a typical slip and fall case. Instead of asking whether a property owner should have fixed a broken step, the question becomes whether the owner should have anticipated criminal conduct on the property and taken reasonable steps — such as adequate lighting, working locks, or security patrols — to reduce that risk.
The leading case on this subject is Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center, decided by the California Supreme Court in 1993. The court held that a landowner’s duty to provide security measures against crime is shaped primarily by the foreseeability of the type of harm that occurred, and that this foreseeability is most often established through evidence of prior similar incidents on the same property.
The court later refined this standard in Delgado v. Trax Bar & Grill, distinguishing between minimally burdensome precautions — such as calling police when trouble starts — and more burdensome measures, like hiring armed guards, which require a higher showing of foreseeability.
This framework has also been extended beyond shopping centers and commercial venues. In Vasquez v. Residential Investments, a California appellate court applied similar principles to residential landlords, holding that simple and inexpensive precautions, such as a functioning lock on a shared entrance, can be required even without a history of prior incidents at that specific address.
How Foreseeability Is Evaluated
Because foreseeability drives so much of a negligent security analysis, the following types of evidence often become central to a claim:
- Police reports or incident logs documenting prior crimes on the same property
- Crime statistics for the surrounding neighborhood or similar properties nearby
- Maintenance records showing broken locks, gates, or non-functioning cameras
- Lighting conditions in parking lots, stairwells, and common areas
- Industry standards for security staffing, surveillance, and access control
California courts have recognized that certain types of properties, including parking structures and late-night businesses, may present enough inherent risk that safety measures are expected even without a documented history of prior crimes at that exact location.
Who May Be Held Responsible
A negligent security claim can potentially involve more than one responsible party. Depending on the facts, liability may extend to:
- The property owner
- A property management company
- A business tenant that controls part of the premises
- A third-party security contractor hired to patrol the property
Apartment complexes, shopping centers, parking garages, hotels, and bars or nightclubs in and around Walnut Creek are among the property types where these claims most often arise.
Comparative Negligence and Its Role in a Claim
California follows a pure comparative negligence system. If an injured visitor is found partially at fault for what happened, their compensation may be reduced by their percentage of fault rather than eliminated entirely.
In a negligent security case, an insurer or defense attorney may raise questions about where the visitor was, why they were there, or what precautions they took. Understanding how comparative fault could apply to a specific set of facts is worth discussing with an attorney early on.
Deadlines That Can Apply to These Claims
Most California personal injury claims, including premises liability and negligent security cases, must be filed within two years of the incident under Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1.
A shorter and stricter timeline applies when a public entity is involved, such as an incident at a BART station, a public parking garage, or another government-owned property in Walnut Creek. Under Government Code Section 911.2, a written claim must generally be presented to the public entity within six months of the incident before a lawsuit can move forward at all. Missing this administrative deadline can permanently bar a claim against a government defendant, even when the underlying facts are strong.
Steps Worth Taking After an Incident
- Seek medical attention and keep records of all treatment related to the injury
- Report the incident to the property owner, manager, or police, and request a copy of any report
- Photograph the scene, including lighting, locks, gates, and any visible security equipment
- Identify and note contact information for any witnesses
- Send a preservation request for surveillance footage as soon as possible, since many systems overwrite recordings within days
- Avoid giving a recorded statement to an insurance representative before understanding how it may affect a claim
Getting Help After a Negligent Security Incident
Negligent security cases often involve multiple potentially responsible parties, competing evidence about foreseeability, and evidence that can disappear within days of an incident. Reviewing the specific facts of an injury with someone familiar with California’s premises liability framework can help clarify what evidence matters most and what steps to take next.
Talk to a Walnut Creek Premises Liability Attorney
Negligent security cases turn on facts that can disappear quickly, including surveillance footage, incident logs, and lighting conditions. Brand Peters PC represents injured clients throughout Contra Costa, Alameda, and Solano Counties in personal injury matters, including premises liability and negligent security claims. Reach out through our contact page or call (925) 489-0746 to discuss your situation.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal guidance tailored to your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney.
What to Do If Your Workers’ Compensation Benefits Suddenly Stop
When a workers’ compensation check stops arriving, the most useful first step is figuring out exactly why, because California law sets firm notice requirements and short deadlines for challenging an unexpected change in benefits. Waiting to see if the next payment shows up can cost an injured worker the chance to act while the dispute is still easy to fix.
Why Workers’ Compensation Benefits Stop Without Warning
A missed payment is rarely random. In nearly every case, the claims administrator has made a decision, even when no one explained it clearly. Some of the most common triggers include:
- Reaching maximum medical improvement (MMI). Once a treating physician determines that a condition has stabilized, temporary disability payments end, even if the worker has not returned to their job.
- Hitting the temporary disability cap. Temporary disability is generally limited to 104 weeks within five years of the date of injury under Labor Code Section 4656, and payments stop once that cap is reached regardless of recovery status.
- A utilization review denial. When a utilization review modifies or denies a treatment recommendation, the disability payments tied to that treatment can stop while the decision is disputed.
- A missed medical appointment. Skipping a scheduled evaluation with a treating physician or Qualified Medical Evaluator can pause indemnity payments until the appointment is rescheduled.
- An open investigation. Claims administrators generally have up to 90 days to investigate a claim under Labor Code Section 5402, and payments can fluctuate while that review is underway.
- Surveillance or suspected inconsistency. A reported activity that appears to conflict with stated work restrictions can prompt an insurer to pause benefits pending further review.
- A return-to-work offer. An insurer may stop temporary disability if it believes a job offer fits within the treating physician’s restrictions.
- An administrative error. Adjuster reassignments, address changes, and processing backlogs can all interrupt a payment schedule without representing an actual decision on the claim.
Confirm What Is Actually Happening With the Claim
Before assuming the worst, contact the claims administrator directly and ask specifically why the payment stopped, then request that explanation in writing. California regulations under Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations Section 9812 require claims administrators to send written notice when temporary disability payments are delayed, denied, or changed, including the reason for the change and what information, if any, is still needed. If that notice was never received, that omission itself may be worth raising. Keep a record of every call, letter, and payment, along with dates and the name of whoever was contacted.
The Rules Designed to Protect Injured Workers
California law gives injured workers several tools to push back when benefits stop without a valid basis:
- Automatic penalties for late payment. Labor Code Section 4650 adds an automatic 10 percent penalty to temporary or permanent disability payments made more than 14 days late, without the worker needing to prove the delay was unreasonable.
- Penalties for unreasonable delay or refusal. Labor Code Section 5814 allows an additional penalty of up to 25 percent of the amount delayed, or $10,000, whichever is less, when payment was unreasonably delayed or refused.
- Protection against retaliation. Labor Code Section 132a makes it unlawful for an employer to punish a worker for filing a claim or having a work-related disability.
- A path to dispute a treatment denial. After a utilization review decision, an injured worker generally has 30 days to request an Independent Medical Review through the Division of Workers’ Compensation.
Steps to Take When Benefits Stop Suddenly
- Document everything. Save notices, emails, voicemail dates, and payment records, since gaps in the paper trail make every later step harder.
- Request a written explanation. Ask the claims administrator to state in writing why the payment changed and what is needed to resume it.
- File for Independent Medical Review if the cause is a treatment denial, and watch the 30-day window closely.
- Contact the DWC Information and Assistance Unit if the claims administrator is unresponsive or the explanation does not add up.
- Consider a Declaration of Readiness to Proceed if informal contact does not resolve the issue, which allows a worker to request a hearing before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.
Important: Many of the deadlines tied to a stopped benefit, including the 30-day window to request an Independent Medical Review, run from the date a notice is served, not the date it is read. Letting a deadline pass can forfeit the right to challenge a decision, even when the underlying claim is strong.
When to Talk to a Workers’ Compensation Attorney
Some interruptions resolve with a phone call. Others point to a deeper dispute, such as a contested MMI finding, a pattern of late payments, or a termination that followed too closely after a claim was filed. A workers’ compensation attorney can review the claim file, identify which deadlines apply, and push back on a decision that was not properly supported.
Talk to a California Workers’ Compensation Attorney
If your benefits have stopped and the explanation does not add up, Brand Peters PC can review your claim and outline the options available under California law. Our workers’ compensation attorneys serve injured workers throughout Walnut Creek and the greater Bay Area. Reach out through our contact page or call (925) 489-0746 to schedule a free consultation.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal guidance tailored to your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney.